Quantcast The Greyhound
College Media Network

Current Issue:

The Bottom Line: Wealth redistribution threatens true justice

Dan Clements

Issue date: 3/24/09 Section: Opinion
  • Print
  • Email
President Obama's new economic plan contains increased tax rates for upper-income individuals and increased benefits for middle- and lower-income earners. We have had a system for decades that offers services available only to the lower class while the upper class picked up the tab. This trend was slightly reversed over the last 20 years, but the President appears to be putting us back on this path. It is, all but in name, the redistribution of wealth.

Many proponents of spreading the wealth around have good intentions. The idea of more or total economic equality seems appealing to a cross-section of our population. However, such notions are in complete conflict with the ideas of equality before the law (which is the basis of liberty) and have real economic consequences for our society. They threaten the freedom our forefathers bought for us in their sacrifices and hold the potential to decimate our market system that has been the engine of our affluence. Proponents constantly crusade in favor of abstract notions of "social justice" or "economic justice." But what is true justice?

Justice in the Western world grew out of conflicts between competing groups. Groups that were in power sought to maintain their power and advance themselves at the expense of everyone else in society. As opposing groups exerted their own power and independence, they demanded equal treatment. Hence, universal codes were written that applied to everybody regardless of where they were assigned in society. In twelfth-century England, King Henry II tried to consolidate absolute rule in England by weakening any obstacles to his power. The nobles revolted and when King John (Henry II's son) was defeated, he was forced to sign the Magna Carta, which guaranteed a few basic freedoms and privileges. This was the first time the absolute power of a monarch was officially restricted, and it led to the adoption of similar documents that guaranteed universal freedoms. The rule of law was established to protect people from the domination by their fellow man and to restrict competing interests from plundering one another. The execution of justice ensured everybody's life and private property were secured. Thus, the English tradition of liberty was born and laid the foundations for our Constitution.
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 2 of 2

rick

posted 3/24/09 @ 9:39 PM EST

"This trend was slightly reversed during the last twenty years"...that's the understatement of the year. The disparity in wealth is greater now than it has been since the 1920s. (Continued…)

Ralph

posted 3/25/09 @ 10:44 AM EST

Dan you are 100% correct in your analysis. Rick I am sick and tired of hearing how wealth has been transferred to only a few and therefore Lord Barack should make it his duty to return it to its rightful owners. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

What is your plan for Study Day this Thursday?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement